Thanks for visiting.
Jamie Zvirzdin
  • Bio
  • Publications
  • Fresh Courage Take
  • Contact

Week 37 and More Notes on Scrabble Sexism

10/2/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
This week is brought to you by the word scrabble, which means "to claw or grope about frantically." I don't connect the feelings I get when I'm clawing frantically at a rock face with the same feelings I experience during a Scrabble game, so I'm curious as to how Scrabble got its name.

Also, after reading seer/seeress, seminal, senhor/senhora, senor/senora/senorita, seraglio/serail, servitor, sexism, and sexpot this week in the Scrabble Dictionary, I have a few more things to say about sexist language (see Week 22 for earlier comments). These problems are not necessarily the fault of the compilers of the Scrabble Dictionary (although I am curious that savant is defined as "a man of profound learning"—only men can be savants?); they are part of a long and sordid story. I want to (and probably should) write a book about how to alleviate some inherently sexist and gender-imbalanced issues in the English language. I'd advocate for the following:

1) People should care less about splitting everything into female or male, particularly for instances where the sex of the individual is unnecessary information for the context. The traditional response has been to use the masculine pronouns for everything; this has caused untold amounts of repression and semantic exclusion throughout history. Studies show that generic masculine pronouns and words like "mankind" reduce the likelihood that people think of everybody, not just men, when these words are used. So many snap judgments are made based on the perceived male/female binary (and its false stereotypes) that relinquishing our obsessive need to know the gender of individuals will ease our almost obsessive need to bifurcate everything. Unfortunately, this begins from the moment a child is conceived: boy or girl?

I suppose it's evolutionary to some degree to want to know someone's gender (gotta know if you can reproduce with them or not!), but I hope we're moving beyond the need to do that, particularly for contexts where it is totally unnecessary (a user manual for an iPhone, for example). It may be comforting to believe that the world is neatly divided into males and females and each has their assigned roles and responsibilities, but life/nature/existence/society/the universe is just not that simple.

2) English needs a gender-neutral third person pronoun. And I'm not talking about the dehumanizing "it." While a neutral third party—so to speak—would be very difficult to introduce into the language, it would solve a lot of problems. See here for proposed pronouns.

I'm personally in favor of ey/eir/em: "Ey went to eir favorite room in the library and picked out a book for emself." It would also be more fair to those who identify neither as male or female—"he or she" doesn't quite work for everyone. We have started to see this shift already. "They" is often used for the singular now (and has been, for a long time). If that's the best we can do—if we have to break singular/plural distinction in order to create a syntax that is less sexist, then so be it. This grammarian accepts it as the second best option short of adopting a new gender-neutral third person pronoun set. If Shakespeare, Chaucer, and Austen can do it, so can I.
Picture
3) "Marked" forms need to drop: poetess, marquise, oratress/oratrix, proette, rani, mayoress, nabobess, matisse, peeress, maharani, editress, and, this week, seeress. I highly recommend reading "Wears Jump Suit. Sensible Shoes. Uses Husband's Last Name" (originally titled "Marked Women, Unmarked Men") by Deborah Tannen, from a New York Times article in 1993. Tannen explains the problem with women becoming the "marked" gender. As Tannen says, "Gender markers pick up extra meanings that reflect common associations with the female gender: not quite serious, often sexual."

Reading the Scrabble Dictionary has shown me that there are an amazing amount of words where the female version of the word is a marked subset of the original word. There are still a few marked male terms: servitor, for instance.

4) Rethink words ending with -man (chairman, mailman, boatsman—there's a ton of these) or beginning with man- (manward, manmade, manpower, manhole, mankind, manwise). I'm still thinking about how this might most easily be done. It may be different for each instance: mankind-->humankind, chairman-->chair or chairperson, manmade-->synthetic, artificial. I've come across quite a few of these words this year. Whenever I see something like "seedman," I think, "Um, other people can sell seeds too!" The etymology of man and women also has a long and sordid story, but it's clear now that man in most cases is used to refer to males, which presents the problem of exclusion.

So those are some of my thoughts, for now. Here are some others that I really, really like, too. We don't have a language police like the French do, and I don't think most people want that (too much like Orwell's 1984), including myself, so I think individuals need to decide and promote these things whenever it's reasonable. I've found that usually kind, funny reminders can help people become aware of these instances. Oddly, the thing I've had to talk to people the most about is the phrase "throwing like a girl." I remind them that I was an all-star softball player when I was in junior high, and once I got hit in the mouth by a softball—a line drive, hit by a girl—and I assure you, it was not just a little funny bonk in the face. My braces-lined teeth had to be torn and wrenched from the inside skin of my lips, and they bled like crazy.

Those who gripe about the difficulties of being politically correct may not understand that to be inclusive is to be mature enough to understand that there are more people out there than just your particular subset of humanity.

Now, on to this week's words!

⚛ Units of the Week
    Scudo: a former Italian coin
    Semis: a coin of ancient Rome
    Sen: a monetary unit of Japan
    Sene: a monetary unit of Samoa
    Sengi: a monetary unit of Zaire
    Seniti: a monetary unit of Tonga
    Sente: a monetary unit of Lesotho
    Senti: a former monetary unit of Tanzania
    Sentimo: a monetary unit of the Philippines
    Ser: a unit of weight of India
    Sesterce: a coin of ancient Rome
    Sextarii: ancient Roman units of liquid measure

!!! Unexpected Words of the Week
    Schlub: a stupid or unattractive person (I should do another post on all the words I've read on words for stupid or ugly people)
    Schmo: a stupid person
    Schmuck: a foolish or clumsy person
    Sclera: the white, fibrous outer coat of the eyeball
    Scofflaw: a habitual law violator
    Scolex: the knoblike head of a tapeworm
    Scrannel: a thin person
    Scrod: a young cod
    Sculch: clean trash
    Scut: a short tail, as of a rabbit
    Secpar: a parsec
    Seel: to stitch closed the eyes of, as a falcon during training
    Seg: one who advocates racial segregation (huh?)
    Selcouth: unusual
    Semihobo: a person having some of the characteristics of a hobo (but not all!)
    Serow: an Asian antelope (I swear, this has been the year of the antelope)
    Setenant: a postage stamp that differs in design from others in the same sheet
    Sett: the burrow of a badger
    Shadchan: a Jewish marriage broker
    Shadrach: a mass of unfused material in the hearth of a blast furnace

♡ Favorite Words of the Week
    Scend: to rise upward, as a ship on a wave
    Schlock: inferior merchandise
    Schlump: to go about lazily or sloppily dressed
    Schmalz: excessive sentimentality
    Schmeer: to bribe
    Schmooze: to gossip
    Schnook: an easily deceived person
    Schnoz: the nose
    Seiche: an oscillation of the surface of a lake or landlocked sea
    Selfhood: the state of being an individual person
    Semiotic: a general theory of signs and symbolism
(Pages 505–518)

1 Comment
Edward Irons
10/3/2014 03:54:01 pm

Schlub or savant, to effect change in language you need to go to the arbiters of spelling and usage. The French try to do this all the time, I hear. Government fiat à la 1984 doesn't work well, it seems.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Jamie Zvirzdin's

    Writing Blog

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Bennington College
    Book Reviews
    Downloads
    Foreign Service
    Poetry
    Published
    Science
    Word Fun

    Blog Roll

    Archives

    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012


© Jamie Zvirzdin 2018. All Rights Reserved